However, in the theoretical sense, Kroeber’s biggest contribution is the re- formulation of Spencer’s concept of the superorganic which Kroeber. The idea of “The superorganic” is associated with Alfred Kroeber, an American anthropologist writing in the first half of the twentieth century. A. L. KROEBER. University of California. Search for more papers by this author. First published: April‐June
|Published (Last):||21 December 2014|
|PDF File Size:||1.88 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.1 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Yet his emphasis on multiple causation and the importance of historical and linguistic variables may yet prove a way out of the blind alleys encountered in the closed and static systems of functionalism and structuralism. He played an important role in organizing the International Symposium on Anthropology and he organized the Conference on Anthropological Horizons, both sponsored by the Wenner—Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. It is also important to emphasize that in asking this question, Kroeber clearly sees the importance of biological anthropology and human evolutionary history to cultural anthropology.
In the growing literature on the Hokan, Penutian, and Athapascan language families his work will continue to be basic.
Radcliffe-Brown on this subject. No longer will you be shackled to Victor Turner now that you can read Kroeber, Sapir, and Goldenweiser!
He reviewed most of the important books about race appearing over a quarter of a century, missing no chance to attack racist interpretations.
The essay is clearly written and structured, but superorganlco is little explicit signposting. Chretien at Berkeley e. If you separate the dog or tree into its separate elements, it dies. The culture element distribution lists are heaviest on material culture and lightest on social organization, where at the time the identification of units was less advanced. What articles come to mind?
Culture as the superorganic
And where documentary or archeological evidence was lacking or inadequate, Kroeber relied heavily superorgznico historical inference or reconstruction based primarily on distributional data. American Anthropological Association, Memoirs 2: Hymes, Dell Alfred Louis Kroeber. Knowing the dynamics of how carbon atoms operate, or that combining hydrogen and oxygen can result in a rapid combustion if not an explosion, does not explain how the tree works, with its leaves converting sunlight into energy to change water and carbon dioxide into oxygen and carbon, channels to transfer sap from leaves to ssuperorganico, and so on.
Thanks for your comment and I hope to continue this discussion with krieber and others, Glenn. I want to give my students early 20th Century essays by Anthros, on the value of oral history as indigenous interpretation of their past.
The superorganic is another way of describing —— and understanding —— culture or the socio-cultural system. Since you know suprorganico the Lowie collection at Berkeley, are there any texts that might be available online?
Kroeber applied a method of sequential dating to kroebet goods, arranging them according to stylistic similarities. His major work on this subject, Configurations of Culture Growthattempts to identify, for nations and areas of the Old World, culminations or peaks in various fields of aesthetic and intellectual endeavor. This elaboration links humans together into communities and societies.
“The Superorganic,” or Kroeber’s hidden agenda.
But he also argues that individual organic endowment cannot affect civilization. With regard to isolated peoples, each South American country has its own unique and varied history with regards to indigenous peoples and their rights, and these varied historical policies directly affect their approach to the specific case of isolated peoples.
Over time I would like to work on the British side of the tradition, since that was actually how I was trained as well at least in undergrad.
For Kroeber the culture area is similar to the biotic area of the biologist, whose definition depends upon the scale of the units compared; from a continental view culture areas may be identified as very large units; from a more microscopic view, they break down into subareas or provinces, depending upon the intensity of analysis.
He paid little attention kroebfr social organization, technology, or ecological adaptations. The implications of these statements need further elucidation [ see Culture ]. In his sophomore year he took a deep interest in English literature and was the leader of a group that founded an undergraduate literary superoorganico indeed, his first publication, inappeared in the Columbia Literary Monthly.
His early interests were primarily historical, and, partly in collaboration with Roland Burrage Dixon, he grouped the California Indian languages into a number of larger families. The second level of complexity is composed of living things.
How, then, could culture have kgoeber if it is such a unique phenomena? Kroeber felt strongly that individual cultures must be considered as wholes, although he never developed a holistic approach that satisfied him.
Superoorganico we start with the inorganic, it is the physical universe, all the atoms of elements without life. Each culture to some degree shares aspects of content and pattern with other cultures, and if several adjacent cultures are surveyed from a sufficient distance, regional patternings emerge.
Culture and society comprise the third level. Most of his some seventy papers on California ethnography deal with ethnological problems, utilizing his ethnographic data. At the same time, Kroeber argues, art and literature conveys truths that are enduring, but which are aesthetic and not scientific.